Google reminds me that today is the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.

Darwin's publication of On the Origin of Species in 1859 rocked the world with the theories of natural selection which led to our modern understanding of evolution.
It wasn't well received from the church.
The problem lies in a literal reading of Genesis for our origins. It is hard to talk about millions of years in evolution when the Bible says six days. A binary thinker will say it's either one or the other. It cannot be both.
We know that evolution is accepted by the scientific community. If we, as a church, believe in education (we support various institutions of higher learning - the closest being Oklahoma City University), we sometimes get caught in the middle of this debate. Is it millions of years or six days?
Is it some combination of the two? Is it all or nothing?
Largely, as a denomination we have said very little regarding evolution versus creation.
That is, until the 2008 General Conference.
A couple of petitions that passed as resolutions by The United Methodist Church clearly take a stand in the whole debate.
One changed the language of our Book of Discipline. The 2008 edition now reads in paragraph 160F (on Science and Technology):
"We find that science’s descriptions of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are not in conflict with theology. "
and
"We find that as science expands human understanding of the natural world, our understanding of the mysteries of God's creation and word are enhanced."
and
"Science and theology are complementary rather than mutually incompatible."
Furthermore, this General Conference passed a resolution (5052) entitled "Evolution and Intelligent Design" that reads:
"Therefore, be it resolved, that the General Conference of The United Methodist Church go on record as opposing the introduction of any faith-based theories such as Creationism or Intelligent Design into the science curriculum of our public schools."
I find these changes to be expressive of my position as a Christian and a pastor. I believe that these are helpful in expressing who we are as a denomination. Most Christians are represented by literalists and those that have a scientific cosmology often feel that their beliefs are not compatible with those of the church.
We offer an alternative. For those feeling shut out because of thier views on science, I would invite you to give us a try!